Christian Theology

August 21, 2008

Starbucks Theology

There I sit, starring into my coffee. Strong rich Starbucksy goodness; cream and sugar; steaming; hiding its secret caffeine treasures somewhere between the bean water molecules. It does rock (that’s “rocketh” in the King James). It, like most good things, makes me think of God. All beautiful things do/should. I’m so glad I’m not an ascetic, or a docetist, or in one of those strange groups that thinks that all of the normal pleasures of this life were the consequences of the Fall. Really, all things were made good, and made to be enjoyed within their proper scope, and designed with a peculiar human relationship in mind. I know this is avidly anti-Copernican but as I am avidly anti-Copernican, let it be.

In theology we should be steadfastly Theocentric. Anthropocentric theologies are too brittle to stand beneath the weight and heat of thorough inspection. I don’t expect God to be the center of anthropology; why should people expect man to be at the center of my Theology? Besides, a disoriented theology tends to hold in its heart a disordered interpretation of self and the world, so that if you lose Christ at the center, you lose man and the world with it. You can’t reach them from there. You can’t reach high enough.

But that’s not to say that our Maker did not create us and the world with some necessarily man centered thinking. Charity, for example, is an expression of the moral nature of God but an expression of the second greatest commandment, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” God doesn’t need charity. Whoever misses that, misses the greatest commandment with it. To love God is primary, not to be harping on the obvious, because the reason for the second greatest commandment is that it is the expression of the greatest commandment. That’s what makes the greatest one the greatest. Bono said, “My God’s not short’a cash mister.” Neither is Bono, but the rest of us could use some help now and again.

We’ve all met people that seem to be by nature inherently lovable and they both inspire and irritate the rest of us. But we love others because we love God. The source of their lovableness is not in themselves and so we don’t really need to consider their unlovablenesses before loving them. Our love for them whether felt, thought, or spoken through deeds of mercy and justice is the love for God visible to those created in His image and likeness.

He loved us when we were not so lovable; how could we withhold due benevolence from another? Do you remember that guy in the Bible that was forgiven a great debt but then had another guy thrown into prison for the smallest offense? God is not pleased with that kind of thing. Those who are forgiven much must be first-rate forgivers. C’mon. Push yourself. Strain for it. Start with me.

Christopher Neiswonger

9 Comments »

  1. [...] There I sit, starring into my coffee. Strong rich Starbucksy goodness; cream and sugar; steaming; hi… Click the link to see the [...]

    Pingback by Starbucks Theology « Apologetics.com Neiswonger — August 21, 2008 @ 4:57 pm | Reply

  2. “I’m so glad I’m not an ascetic, or a docetist, or in one of those strange groups that thinks that all of the normal pleasures of this life were the consequences of the Fall. Really, all things were made good, and made to be enjoyed within their proper scope, and designed with a peculiar human relationship in mind.”

    “He loved us when we were not so lovable; how could we withhold due benevolence from another?”

    The first part makes me smile.

    The second part nails me to the wall.

    (wow poet and didn’t know it)

    I knew you were a Starbucks freak like me.
    lol

    Comment by Anais — August 22, 2008 @ 5:35 pm | Reply

  3. It’s not so freaky. I consider myself more of a… Fan. :)

    Still, they just make a great cupa Joe. I don’t know how they do it. Top secret stuff. You would need to be the President or something to get the recipe. Or mabye it’s magic, like Harry Potter. Or Aliens like… um… Aliens.

    C

    Comment by Neiswonger — August 22, 2008 @ 5:36 pm | Reply

  4. It’s the beans and the way they are dried and roasted. Seriously. I used to work at Starbucks.

    But the Aliens do grow them.
    lol

    Comment by Anais — August 22, 2008 @ 5:37 pm | Reply

  5. Yeah, I tend to be loving when people walk into my church; but a little apprehensive about it everywhere else… good, good.

    Comment by RevK — August 22, 2008 @ 11:18 pm | Reply

  6. “…hiding its secret caffeine treasures somewhere between the bean water molecules.

    wonder if caffeine treasure have microscopic leprechaun guardians?lol!

    Comment by Hayden{the deus to your machina} — August 25, 2008 @ 6:32 pm | Reply

  7. Only at the end of the stimulant rainbow :)

    Comment by Neiswonger — August 25, 2008 @ 6:34 pm | Reply

  8. I am sadly disappointed in you friend. . . Starbucks? Yummy? I shall pray for thy salvation from bad coffee I’m a staunch fan of Barnies myself. Starbucks just tastes like. . . burnt. . . something. . . at any rate. really good thinking. . . I wish I had deep moments of thought over coffee. . . usually it’s “coffffffffffffffffeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. . .
    ugh” and then I run into something because I’m not awake yet

    Comment by Master Nyte — August 26, 2008 @ 4:41 pm | Reply

  9. Nyte,

    I feel sadly pre-judged. 1st, I don’t even know what Barnies is but I thought it was a dancing dinosaur. 2nd, it’s not always burnt. 3rd, it’s an addiction which means it’s a disease which means I’m not responsible for my actions which means I’m actually fully virtuous no matter what I do which means something or other that proves my point. nuff said.

    Christopher

    Comment by Neiswonger — August 26, 2008 @ 4:42 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.